The twenty-first century.
A broad based prediction from the middle of the
night May 1999
These words are not offered as a warning because it
is too late and warnings won't prevent the inevitable. Be warned only that some
places will be safer than others for some people and not for others.
A storm is gathering that will make all others in
human history pale by comparison. The early years of the Third Millennium will
be marked with tragedy beyond any scale mankind now knows. Death destruction
and terror will rule the planet. The planet itself will contribute little to
the cataclysm. It is all but
unaffected by our presence. We are
no more than vague fungi on the planet’s face. In our character we have the
dynamic to bring all this about.
In our past history we have sown the seeds of what is to come. In the nineteenth and twentieth century
we moved the pieces into position. We nurtured all the things and allowed the
growth of ideas and concepts that will guarantee a tragedy of biblical
proportions. We will be brought down by lies and religion, and religion and
lies. They live together in a
hellish alliance. One cannot live
without the other.
People, humans, mankind, are unable to be honest and
truthful about their sameness and their differences. They concocted many lies and repeated them many times even
to themselves and they asked themselves to believe them knowing them to be
foolish. They do not have the
wisdom to know that the lies would come back to haunt them.
The fate of the land is damage from fire and
destruction that will heal in time. The fate of vast populations of people will
be a different matter. The people from all races and nations refuse to learn
from the stupidity of the past, they refuse to see the obvious. You will to,
until you see it before you. When you do you will remember my words and regret
your blindness. You will
know that what you see here as you read on is true, but many of you will be too
stubborn to accept it. You will
deny it to yourself although you know in your heart it is true. I say accept it because belief is
something that requires faith. This knowledge requires only acceptance of what
you already know. Accept it. The planet will continue on its natural path with
all the normal cataclysmic phenomena that afflicts men. The planet will
continue on its own path to destruction regardless of the efforts of men.
The tide will turn after an outrage, an outrage that
will come from religion, from the militants of Islam. This Islamic Outrage will
polarise the peoples and the powers of the world. On the one hand the West with
the power of knowledge scholarship, science and industry, on the other hand the
Middle East with the power of oil, insane religious belief, terrorism and
extremism. It will bring millions in the west to acquiesce to racial and
religious separatism and persecution as shown by the people who lived under
Fascism and Communism. The mind-set of these millions will allow the internment
and deportations of other millions.
People born in one country will be deported to the land of their
forefathers. The deported will be as much to blame for the tragedy as those
expelling them, but they will suffer as innocents.
Religious
and ethnic groups around the world will be distracted from their petty
squabbles to look in fear on the gathering storm of Islamic militancy. Morality
will be ineffectual alongside the rage of race and religion.
The Islamic Outrage will occur in a western capital.
It will be the first use of a weapon of mass destruction since the end of the
Second World War. The weapon, a
nuclear, toxic, or biological bomb, will arrive in this city by the ordinary
path of travel and trade.
This Islamic Outrage will cause enormous destruction
and loss of life where it is perpetrated but that will be the least of its
effect. It will halt the progress of the western democracies from their journey
toward tolerance of other cultures and religions. It will cause the West to
rise up in a way that will astound themselves as well as the militants of
Islam. The retaliation of the West will be huge and complete. Europe will defend itself from the
Islamic threat from within by interning millions. The tools to do this are being assembled as I write. As the first are interned the
indigenous European populations will acquiesce to the will of governments
wishing to rid itself of the Islamic threat. Neighbour will turn against
neighbour. Europeans will no longer tolerate protest from those who wish for
tolerance. Their own former tolerance will be seen to be shallow and no more
than a fashionable affectation.
The European population will demand of their leaders protection from the
excesses of Islamic fundamentalists. At first only Islamics will be interned in
these concentration camps with a new and fearful name, then as perceptions
change these camps will come to be seen as a necessary evil, necessary for the
greater good and a wide range of people perceived to be a threat will be
interned and then later transported to other continents, or eliminated. Millions of Africans will be
transported back to Africa, Arabs to the Middle East and Asians to Asia.
Written early July 2000.
In the following pages I will tell more of this
story as is clear to me and I will need to fall back on my own life experience
to explain the dynamics that will bring these things about.
I was born in Wellington New Zealand in the early
years of the Second World War. I went to a Catholic school in the late forties
and through the fifties. My experience of war was only the grainy black and
white pictures in newspapers and the tangible fear of the adult women around me
who worried about the safety of husbands posted overseas to far off
battlefields and the prospect of invasion by hoards of Asian Japanese who were
perceived to have little or no humanity.
Those fears and beliefs will return again in the
first half of the twenty first century as China grows in strength to become the
most feared nation on earth and Indonesia struggles with the divisions
exaggerated by Islamic militancy.
North Korea will remain a rogue nation and will be
strengthened by western aid and technology provided in an effort to appease
them.
Japan will appease China and become subordinate to
its power. America will retreat to
its home shores.
Australia will live in fear as its northern shores
are colonised not by governments but by lawless boat people from Indo China and
Indonesia. Australia will agree to
allow Indonesia or China to occupy its northern regions under the pretext of
controlling these renegade people.
This will eventually lead to China’s annexation of northern Australia
and then eventually the whole country.
New Zealand will be troubled by the militancy of the
indigenous rights groups but will, like Japan and Australia, need to appease
China and allow a wave of immigration that will swamp the rights of all. The indigenous people will live to
reflect on their contempt for the Europeans as the Chinese take eventual
control of their homeland and work to wipe out cultural ideologies that differ
from their own. Many Europeans will leave Australia and New Zealand to live in
North America and Europe. The
decedents of the colonisers will return to the homes of their forefathers and
be strangers in strange lands.
The
pacific islands will become both strategic possession and the playground of the
Chinese who will have no use for the indigenous inhabitants. As one by one they fall under the heel
of China the USA will withdraw to their mainland to deal with the problems
brought on at home by The Islamic Outrage.
Russia will go through a transition from a criminal
state to a state ruled with an iron hand by the descendants of the criminal
gangs of the late twentieth century and the early twenty first century. The ruthless power of Russia will be
sought after by the European governments trying to deal with a legacy of years
of liberalism followed by the social fallout from The Islamic Outrage. Russia will loose much of its Eastern
regions to China’s expansion.
Unlike the West, Russia and China will not be troubled by the niceties
of human rights issues, -- and as the crisis deepens, neither will the
West. Russia will become Europe’s
buffer, protecting it from China’s expansion. To aid this Europe will provide Russia with billions in
military aid.
Written late July 2000.
Africa is already descending into the total social
and economic chaos that will be the norm for at least 100 years. It will be saved eventually by the
transportation to its shores of millions of blacks from the USA and
Europe. Events in Africa in the
year 2000, and particularly in Zimbabwe are a catalyst for a change of attitude
by both black and white all over the world. Robert Mugabe has demonstrated something that many Europeans
and all people of colour have always known but have not been allowed to speak
of. That is that all races are
equally racist. All men with
common sense know this is true and make their judgments of events from that
position. You know this but may be one of many reluctant to admit it even to
yourself.
Events
in Africa will show the liberal Europeans living anywhere in the world that
they are more in danger from the racism of others toward them than they ever
thought possible. It will be a
revelation to many of them that their perception that they were the most racist
people on the planet was a foolish one.
Those nations and individuals who were the most liberal will become the
most xenophobic. They will be
grossly offended that the people they most wanted to protect from the slights
of fellow Europeans have betrayed them.
As I write this in the year 2000 it is clear to me
that South Africa will quickly follow Mugabe’s lead and begin terrorising white
citizens. By the year 2010 there
will be a wave of European emigration from Africa and with them will go the last
vestiges of modern ordered society.
By the year 2020 travel to Africa will be something to be considered
with great care even by those supported by military force. Disease and war will
decimate the population. By the
year 2030 the once great cities of Durban and Cape town will be fearful places
all but destroyed. It will be said that Africa has returned to the Stone Age
but in fact it will have moved into a time far more dangerous than the Stone
Age. There will be enough modern
weaponry to make life anywhere in the whole African continent a fragile
thing. If you are from South
Africa you will know this is true.
Alliances will continue to shift like quicksand in
the Islamic world until The Islamic Outrage. The aftermath of this will bring them together for the first
time. They will recognise their
weaknesses of division and they will unite as pariah on the planet. Their weakness will be the fact that
they have no academia capable of developing technology or industry to meet the
rising tide of vengeance from the western powers. They will pay the price of
failing to develop their own ability to create the things and luxuries they
ridiculed but lusted after.
There will be great bloodshed talked about all over
the world as Armageddon and there will be many rumours of the second coming and
the arrival of the Beast of the biblical revelations. The western lifestyle
some of the Islamics enjoy now will fade away as they are unable to maintain
and replenish it.
One by
one the Islamic nations will be enslaved by occupation and isolation and their
own inability to accept any responsibility for the global carnage. They will still foolishly believe that
god is on their side and they will share generations of social darkness with
the Africans.
These words will be anathema to many people. I will
explain as it comes clear to me where these thoughts come from. They are not revelations from a higher
being, they are simply a true recognition of the human condition and an
extrapolation from today’s position.
2
The beginnings of an explanation
The people in Europe who perpetrated the horrors of
the Second World War were the contemporaries of your parents and mine,
seemingly civilised reasonable and moral people. The Nazi criminals and the
people who can commit the dreadful deeds such as done in the German
concentration camps, exist in every society and every neighbourhood on the
planet. There is no race that does
not have these people in their midst. Even they themselves may not know what
they are as they wait like sleepers in the population until the day when the
dogs of disaster are loosed. You
know this is true.
The effect of these people in the population of
developed countries will be magnified by the growing under-class bought into
existence by the ever expanding wealth of the Western Global commercial and
information sector and their contempt and apathy toward social problems faced
every day by poorer people. This
low-income sector will become a renegade society within society and will be a
problem those governments and the ruling elite will be unable to come to terms
with. You know this is true. You see this under-class growing in size about
you. If you don’t you are blind
and stupid.
After The Islamic Outrage, many of these social
outcasts will be employed by the state and by the wealthy to deal with the
religious and racial outcasts. They will become prison guards, soldiers,
tormentors, torturers, enforcers and executioners. Their survival skills and contempt for human life will make
them a devastating and ruthless army untroubled by moral judgments about what
they will be called upon to do.
Money and the lust for blood will rule them. The “respectable” elite who employ them will argue that it
is all for the “greater good” and learn a new lie to tell themselves to protect
their feelings of superiority and morality.
The collective morality of the human race is a
product of two things - belief and knowledge. These two things may seem in concert but they are not. They are in direct opposition to each
other. Knowledge is confidence
and common sense. Belief is
ego driven weakness. Belief
does not need to be supported by facts.
Knowledge has no need of belief. If you think about this you will know
it is true. People with knowledge
are often in disagreement with people with belief. People with belief will often refuse to accept the realities
of knowledge when it confronts them and is in conflict with their beliefs. This
and greed are the cause of all conflict between peoples. The people of the Axis,
Germans, Italians and Japanese, were carried into the Second World War by
dogma, ignorance and prejudice. If
Hitler had not invaded Poland as early as he did then Britain in the late
forties would have become fascist and been a pliable ally. Many on all sides who knew what
was coming remained silent for fear of ridicule while some spoke up and were
ridiculed and punished. By 1941
well meaning Jewish people selected their most healthy to be loaded on to
cattle trucks believing them to be destined for better places. Others with common sense warned of the
obvious and were ridiculed. You
know this is true. It will happen
again, (but not to the Jews).
Some in the 1930s had been warning European Jews for
more than a decade that a conflagration was coming but most would not believe
it. You may well do the same as
you read this.
Remember that as the Axis powers waged bloody war
across the northern hemisphere in the 1940s the righteous powers of the allies
allowed themselves access to more and more immoral and brutal retaliation. They were waging war for “The Greater
Good.”
3
For the purpose of this writing I need to separate
what I know from what it may seem that I believe. I don’t “believe” any of what I say here about what might
happen in the next 100 years or beyond today’s date but I will write what I
think is probable. A forecast – not a prophesy. The things that I know are the things that you also know.
The difference between me and many who will read this is that I am prepared to
acknowledge and accept the probable results of our actions past and present.
Here is an example of something that will be pivotal
to the future of humanity. You
know it is true but might find it disturbing or offensive to see in print.
Western European civilisation and Society has
created the most desirable lifestyle existing on the planet today, 2000. It is the lifestyle aspired to by all
of the developing nations. That’s
why we call them the “Developing Nations”. What are they developing? They are developing a western lifestyle that may be tempered
with their own cultural colour but none the less will be a western
lifestyle. They want to have the
products, commodities, services and medical and other benefits developed by the
Global Western Civilisation. This is referred to by world leaders when they
speak of the haves and the have-nots.
The haves have a western lifestyle and the have-nots do not.
Here is another.
The have-nots are angry, and resentful that they do
not also have what they can see is a comfortable and easy lifestyle such as
they know exists in the West. They are angry with the west (and therefore
Europeans) for this and for several more important reasons. That is, that if and when they get a western
lifestyle they will remain resentful that they aspire to things that are the
rewards of an alien culture, the culture of the “White Man”. They will remain
angry and resentful because they know their cultural background contributed
nothing to the things that they want.
They feel like second-class people for knowing that their culture made
no contribution yet they still desire it.
They know that the people who have lived in the western lifestyle have
no desire to live anywhere where the trappings of a western lifestyle are not
available. They (and Europeans) do not aspire to the lifestyle of the Bantu,
the Arab, the Eskimo or the Ethiopian and none of these people who have some
how achieved a western lifestyle wish to return to what they were. You know this is true. The people of
these other cultures perceive that Western society is deliberately depriving
them of the Western lifestyle. It must be acknowledged that the most important
culture on the planet is the culture of Western European Global
Civilisation. This is the culture
that people from other planets will want to deal with.
The Bantu in South Africa might well believe that if
it were not for the White Man (he will not discrimination between the white
races) he would be living in a big house in Capetown. He does not give thought to the fact that the big house in
Capetown is the creation of the White Man and as such he guards possession of
it. The Liberal in Europe in the
year 2000 will say that the White man in Capetown only owns that big house
because he exploited the Bantu.
This belief only has a grain of truth. Without the existence of the Bantu the White Man would still
have created his big house just as the Bantu would have created a mud and
thatch house and the Eskimo an Igloo.
That is the nature of their lifestyle and culture. Until the Bantu becomes part of the
Western Culture he has no way to create the big house. When he does there is a
good chance that he will demand of the Europeans that they give great respect
to the Bantu Culture he no longer wants to be part of. This way he can assuage the guilt he
feels about leaving it behind.
Many people will see these comments as racist
because they imply that Europeans created the Global Western Culture and those
other cultures are not equal. Both these statements are true. You know that. I call it (the global culture) European
because it originated in Europe, migrated with the Europeans to America and
grew from those two places. All of the primary elements in modern society have
their origins in those two places.
You know this is true. It is politically incorrect to say this but it is
never the less “accurate”.
The Global Western European Culture is the only
culture on the planet that actively works to preserve and sustain other
cultures and yet those other cultures such as New Zealand Maori, Australian
Aboriginal, Canadian Inuit and Native American Indian continue to denigrate
European culture and blame it for all that ails them. It is interesting that all of these indigenous cultures
demand and get special status in their own countries yet no one wants to accord
this right to indigenous Europeans in their countries.
Think about the first part of this statement and be
challenged to name one other culture on the planet that works to nurture and
save another.
The Chinese, even as they are moving towards a fully
industrialised and productive future seem bent on destroying the Tibetans and
the Mongolians. Their huge and
powerful culture has no interest in preserving the dying cultures that live
adjacent to it. Remember that the
Bantus hate the Zulus, the Hutus and the Tootsies have killed each other in
their thousands in a war that is about race. The People in Seria Leoni have such contempt for other
tribes that they use machetes to amputate the hands and arms of thousands of
children to create a race of humiliated and disabled people dependent on
others. In Uganda the forces of
Idi Amin murdered hundreds of thousands of people from other tribes. Eritrea is
at war with Ethiopia. Robert
Mugabe in Zimbabwe ruthlessly eliminated all opposition from the tribe of
Joshua Nkomo after the Europeans ceded power to the Blacks in the Seventies??
Now he has turned his attention to the White farmers and business people in a
campaign that will eventually cripple the Nation and bring on the new Dark Age.
In what you might call the border between the
Eastern nations and the Western nations, the Japanese despise the Koreans and
many do not like westerners or the western influences. The Arabs want to destroy the Israelis. The Indians and the Pakistanis are at
war over religion and cultural differences and everywhere you look the Islamics
are either involved in a Jihad or threatening one.
Africa is worst. Everywhere you look in Africa there
are racial wars and we in the west blame ourselves for all of this by according
the responsibility to the colonialisation process of the last 400 years. It is never suggested in the West that
the Africans themselves might contribute to their own misfortune because such a
statement would be politically incorrect.
If you can’t speak of it how can you fix it?
As you look at Africa in the light of this, how
could you believe that the millions who have suffered in civil wars and learned
contempt for human life could ever raise children who might run a nation of
fair and just people? How will
these damaged people educate their next generation to become a people who might
run a modern nation that is capable of looking after its own, let alone caring
about the survival of another culture or people. How long is it since these
people lived in peace? -- have they ever? Africa is doomed to generations of social and economic
darkness. You know this is true.
It is often implied by the politically correct that
the continent of Africa lived in peace and plenty before the European slavers
arrived. It is seldom acknowledged
that the Arabs had been trading in Negro slaves since before biblical times and
that the tradition of Negro slavery in the West arose out of that. Another thing that is never
acknowledged that the slavers had to have the cooperation of Africans to gather
the huge numbers that were transported to America, (and even more to South
America.) There is no doubt that
slavery in America would have been terrible for some but there would have been
others whose lifestyles would have vastly improved. It should be remembered that many Europeans living in the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries were also living close to slavery. Indentured European labourers in
Britain and the Colonies where just slaves by another name. There are still
wealthy European families in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Canada and
The USA whose so-called “Old Money” came from this sort of exploitation.
The abolition of slavery in the West was a step
along the journey to tolerance for the global culture that I spoke of
earlier. It is a fact however,
that the culture of slavery and the sale of human beings still exists in all
the regions of Africa from where the slaves of old were transported to the
West. (it is also endemic among the Arabs, particularly in Saudi.) If you watch
CNN or read a newspaper you will know that is true.
All of these statements are a heresy in the current
culture of the West where political correctness is the norm. Political correctness is endemic
in the population of all western countries and I am sure it will have crept
into my writing on these pages because I to am affected by the conditioning of
my surroundings.
Politically correct philosophies are offered to
justify the lies that people are expected to accept and repeat as their
own. Think about the term itself.
Political correctness is a correctness that is defined in a certain way. It implies dogma, and dogma is belief,
and belief has nothing to do with actual knowledge or actual correctness. The
word correct has no ambiguity. It
has a clear meaning. Correct is correct.
Politically correct, dogmatically correct or religiously correct are
definitions of opinion. They are
all about what is acceptable to a society at a given time. It is about social
opinion and social opinion will change.
You know this is true.
My knowledge of history is not great but a
relatively meagre knowledge is all you need to understand and know this next
statement. This little piece of history illustrates constantly changing social
opinion.
Political correctness, as it is known in the later
part of the twentieth century, supports totally different ideologies and dogma
than the political correctness of earlier times but it works today in exactly
the same way as it did during the French Revolution and earlier during the
reign of Henry the Eighth. Then
the accusation that you were a papist (supporter of the pope) could get you
killed without trial by a mob of Henry’s supporters. For the centuries of the Inquisition the accusation of
heresy was fatal and the Catholic Church still exacted terrible punishments for
it until 1870. During the
French Revolution all an enemy had to do was accuse you of having royalist
sympathies and your life was forfeit.
In the nineteenth century you could still get accused of being a witch
and find it impossible to prove otherwise. In the early part of the twentieth century in Russia any
ordinary person only needed to tell a Bolshevist that you were sympathetic to
the Tsar and you would be in grave danger. In the thirties as Hitler came to power in Germany the
accusation that you were a Jew, married to a Jew, a friend of a Jew, a client
of a Jew, sympathetic to Jews would see you loose your job, your livelihood,
your home, your freedom or your life.
Unscrupulous people used such accusations to take your job or put paid
to business competition or rid themselves of a rival for a woman’s
interest. In the nineteen fifties
in America, McCarthyism ruined the lives of thousands of good people when they
were accused of being commies by other ordinary folk. Many people on both sides of that politically correct
ideology are still alive today.
Many of these people knew that they were supporting and accepting a
lie. Like Hitler’s Brownshirts
they were our contemporaries. To
stand up and disagree meant that you might be one of them, the accused. All these accusations through the ages
had one thing in common. They were
mostly unprovable either way because they were about belief and insane
political or religious ideas that have not stood the test of time.
We all know that this is true but are you
objective enough to accept it in the context of the late twentieth century?
Today, the year 2000, the same dynamic of unprovable
accusation is at work in our Western European society and the people of third
world countries are well aware of it and use it to their advantage and to the
disadvantage of the West in all their political and strategic dealings with
it. The accusation that the
politically correct in our own society might make against you today would be
that you are a sexist a racist, or culturally unsafe. These accusations are
regularly levelled against us as individuals, as nations or as part of the
Western European Global Culture.
All accusations are unprovable either way but they always leave a taint
and they always gain an advantage for the accuser, and as often as not the
accuser is among us. As the
current politically correct ideology looses credibility (as it will) watch
them, the proponents of it, deny ever believing in it. Watch them take up the cudgel for the
opposite point of view. This is
the human dynamic that the parable of Judas denying Jesus attempts to
illustrate.
It is interesting to note here that sexism or anti
feminism has always been lumped in with racism or so called cultural
unsafety. The people who support
feminist dogmas often find themselves supporting racial or cultural ideologies
that are more anti women that anything they might find in western global
culture. For example; Feminist activists lending support to apparently anti
racist dogma that supports cultures that have and enforce laws that absolutely
ensure the subjugation of women.
You will have heard apologists for this kind of thing speaking about it
on the news or in print and like me you might have been amazed at the verbal
contortions they go through to avoid confronting the foolish reality of their
position. They will speak a lie
that supports the apparently anti racist/pro feminist position while knowing it
to be a lie and knowing that most people who hear it will also know its a lie
but accept it as a politically correct dogma. They might argue when questioned about it that it is all for
the “greater good”. If they cannot
find words to argue they will resort to the “Scoff.”
After this I started to ramble a bit because I was a bit overawed by what I had done - so I will stop here. But I have to say, that today September 2013 - As I read this now I find a lot of it chilling - so much of it has turned out to be true. I would describe China in different words now but I do think that much of what I have said about it is true. I did not realise the impact the Chinese would have in Africa - since today they are busy colonizing the place - so who knows how that might turn out. As for this Islamic Outrage - I think it is yet to come - and I thought that even as the twin Towers crashed to the ground.
